top of page
  • Writer's pictureImmergity Immigration Consultant

Criminal Inadmissibility and it's Impact on Canada's Permanent Residency and Citizenship Eligibility

Updated: Dec 21, 2023


Criminal Inadmissibility Canada

Canadian Immigration Law Overview

Canadian immigration laws are structured around the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), which sets forth the policies governing the admission of immigrants, including refugees, to Canada. The act aims to fulfill Canada's international legal obligations with respect to refugees and uphold its humanitarian tradition.


Permanent Residence (PR) in Canada is a status granting someone who is not a Canadian citizen the right to live and work in Canada indefinitely. There are several pathways to obtaining PR, including economic streams (like the Express Entry system), family sponsorship, the Provincial Nominee Program (PNP), and others.


Transitioning from PR to Canadian citizenship involves meeting certain criteria, such as physical presence in Canada for at least 1,095 days within the five years before applying, adequate knowledge of English or French, no immigration-related prohibitions, and having filed taxes, if required under the Income Tax Act.


Criminal Inadmissibility in Canada

Definition and Legal Basis: Criminal inadmissibility is a ground for denying someone entry to Canada or for removing them from Canada if they have already entered. The IRPA specifies that foreign nationals and permanent residents can be inadmissible for various reasons, including security, health, or financial reasons, but criminality is one of the most stringent categories.


Categories of Crimes: Criminal inadmissibility is typically divided into two broad categories:

  1. Serious Criminality: Under section 36(1) of the IRPA, this involves crimes committed in Canada punishable by a term of imprisonment of at least 10 years, or crimes committed outside of Canada that, if committed in Canada, would carry a similar sentence. It also includes being convicted of a crime in Canada with a sentence of more than six months' imprisonment.

  2. Criminality: Under section 36(2) of the IRPA, this involves being convicted in Canada of an offense under an Act of Parliament punishable by way of indictment, or of two offenses not arising out of a single occurrence. For offenses committed outside Canada, it involves actions that would constitute an indictable offense under Canadian law.

Types of Offenses

In Canadian law, offenses are generally categorized into three main types: summary conviction offenses, indictable offenses, and hybrid offenses. These categories are important when considering matters of immigration, as they help determine the severity of a crime and thus its impact on immigration status, including permanent residency and citizenship eligibility.


  • Summary Conviction Offenses:

These are considered less serious and carry lighter penalties. In the context of immigration, a single summary conviction offense (excluding offenses causing bodily harm or involving the trafficking or production of drugs) may not render an individual inadmissible for serious criminality but could still affect their immigration process. It could, for example, delay an application or result in a need for a Temporary Resident Permit (TRP) depending on the circumstances and whether the person is deemed rehabilitated.

  • Indictable Offenses:

These are serious crimes that carry more severe penalties. A conviction for an indictable offense can lead to inadmissibility for serious criminality under Canadian immigration law. This can prevent the granting of permanent residence or citizenship or can lead to the loss of permanent resident status and removal from Canada.

  • Hybrid Offenses:

These offenses can be prosecuted either as summary conviction or indictable offenses at the discretion of the Crown prosecutor. In immigration matters, hybrid offenses are treated as indictable offenses, which means they are considered serious. If someone is convicted of a hybrid offense, it will be treated as an indictable offense in terms of criminal inadmissibility under the IRPA.


Deemed Rehabilitation:

  • An individual may be deemed rehabilitated if a certain period has passed since the completion of the sentence for the offense. For a summary offense, this is typically after 5 years. For an indictable offense, the period could be longer, and the individual may need to apply for rehabilitation.

Legal Interpretation:

  • The interpretation of what constitutes a summary, indictable, or hybrid offense in a foreign jurisdiction compared to Canada is a complex legal matter. For immigration purposes, it's not just the foreign conviction that matters but how that conviction would be treated under Canadian law.

Impact on Immigration:

  • The type of offense can affect the eligibility for permanent residence or citizenship. For example, Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) will look at whether the applicant has committed an offense that would be punishable in Canada by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years, which would indicate serious criminality.

Discretion and Case-by-Case Assessment:

  • Each case is assessed on its own merits. The IRPA provides officers with the discretion to consider the individual circumstances of an applicant, including the nature of the offense, the behavior since the offense, and the time that has elapsed.

In immigration proceedings, the categorization of an offense and the details of the conviction, including whether it was a summary, indictable, or hybrid offense, are crucial in determining an individual's admissibility to Canada. The subtleties of these categorizations often require legal expertise to navigate, especially when translating foreign legal concepts to their Canadian equivalents.


Consequences and Enforcement: The consequences of being deemed criminally inadmissible vary. For those outside Canada, it can mean a denied visa or entry. For those within Canada, it can lead to a removal order. The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) is the primary enforcement body that deals with inadmissibility issues.


Overcoming Criminal Inadmissibility - There are a few ways to overcome criminal inadmissibility:

  • Temporary Resident Permit (TRP): This can be issued for a specific period to someone who is otherwise inadmissible. It is a temporary solution that allows entry for a compelling reason despite the inadmissibility.

  • Rehabilitation: For those who have committed or been convicted of a crime outside of Canada, they can apply for rehabilitation if a certain period has passed since they completed their sentence. This period is usually five years but can be more or less depending on the crime.

  • Record Suspension or Pardon: For crimes committed in Canada, a person may apply for a record suspension (formerly known as a pardon) after a certain period. This does not erase the crime but sets aside the conviction for immigration purposes.

Impact on Immigration Processes: Criminal inadmissibility can have a profound impact on immigration processes. It can:

  • Halt the processing of an application for permanent residence.

  • Lead to the refusal of an application for citizenship.

  • Result in loss of status and removal for current permanent residents.

Legal Framework and Case Law: The legal framework for dealing with criminal inadmissibility is complex and involves a combination of IRPA provisions, regulatory guidelines, and case law from Canadian courts. Case law can provide insight into how the law is applied, as courts interpret the provisions of the IRPA in light of specific cases.


Offenses that can impact Canadian Immigration Applications or Status

Here are some examples of offenses that can affect immigration to Canada:

  1. Crimes of Dishonesty: Theft, fraud, and forgery can be grounds for inadmissibility. For instance, a conviction for credit card fraud, regardless of the value involved, could be considered serious criminality if the potential punishment is severe.

  2. Drug Offenses: Offenses involving the possession, trafficking, or production of controlled substances can lead to inadmissibility. Even a minor drug possession charge in another country could be problematic if the act is punishable by indictment in Canada.

  3. Driving Under the Influence (DUI): DUIs are taken seriously in Canadian immigration. With changes to the Criminal Code, DUIs are now considered serious criminality because they can be punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

  4. Assault: This can include domestic violence, bar fights, etc. Even if an assault charge is treated as a summary conviction offense, multiple summary convictions can lead to inadmissibility for criminality.

  5. Sexual Offenses: Convictions for sexual assault, molestation, or other sex-related crimes are taken very seriously and typically result in inadmissibility.

  6. Crimes Involving Bodily Harm: Any crime that involves bodily harm to another person, or the threat thereof, can be grounds for inadmissibility, especially if it can be prosecuted by indictment.

  7. Crimes Against Property: Burglary or robbery, where there is an element of breaking and entering or theft with violence or threat of violence, can cause inadmissibility issues.

  8. Human or International Rights Violations: War crimes, crimes against humanity, or being a senior official in a government engaged in gross human rights violations or subject to international sanctions can lead to inadmissibility.

  9. Participation in Organized Crime: Involvement with organizations known for criminal activity, such as gangs or mafia, can lead to a person being deemed inadmissible.

  10. Security Offenses: Espionage, subversion (e.g., attempting to overthrow a government), or terrorism are very serious offenses leading to inadmissibility.

  11. Misrepresentation: While not a criminal offense under the Criminal Code, misrepresentation in the immigration process itself is a serious matter under IRPA. It can lead to being banned from entering Canada for several years.


For all these examples, whether the offense will affect immigration depends on how the crime equates to Canadian law, the severity of the crime, the sentence imposed, and when the sentence was completed. The Canadian government also takes into consideration the number of offenses committed and the period over which they occurred. Rehabilitation, either deemed or applied for, and pardons (record suspensions) can also play a role in addressing inadmissibility.


Impact on Permanent Residence Application

When applying for permanent residence in Canada, the impact of criminality is a critical factor in the assessment of an applicant’s eligibility. Here’s how criminal offenses can affect the application process:


Application Screening:

  • All applicants for Canadian permanent residence are required to undergo a criminal background check. This involves providing police certificates from every country where an applicant has lived for six months or more since the age of 18. Canadian immigration authorities will use this information to determine whether there are grounds for criminal inadmissibility.

Inadmissibility for Criminality:

  • If the background check reveals that an applicant has been convicted of a crime that would be considered serious criminality under Canadian law, the application is likely to be refused. This includes crimes that carry a potential prison sentence of 10 years or more in Canada, as well as actual sentences received for six months or more.

Rehabilitation and Deemed Rehabilitation:

  • Applicants with past criminal convictions may still be able to immigrate to Canada if they can prove they have been rehabilitated. Rehabilitation means that enough time has passed since the completion of the entire sentence (including probation) and the applicant can demonstrate that they are no longer a risk for criminal activity.

  • Deemed rehabilitation may occur if a sufficient amount of time has passed since the sentence was completed, typically after 10 years for one indictable offense or five years for two summary offenses.

Effect on Different Categories of Immigration:

  • Economic immigrants (including skilled workers and business immigrants), family class immigrants, and refugees all must pass the criminal admissibility assessment. A conviction can affect not only the principal applicant but also their dependents, as the family is assessed together.

Disclosure of Criminal History:

  • Applicants must disclose all criminal history, regardless of whether the conviction has been expunged or pardoned in the country where it occurred. Failure to disclose can be considered misrepresentation, a serious offense that can lead to a finding of inadmissibility on its own.

Impact on PR Status for In-Canada Applicants:

  • For applicants who are already in Canada, such as those applying from within the country or making refugee claims, a criminal conviction can lead to the loss of status and removal from Canada. This process is separate from the application for permanent residence and is handled by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).

Appeals and Judicial Reviews:

  • Applicants who are refused on the grounds of criminality have limited rights to appeal. In some cases, they may be able to request a judicial review of the decision by the Federal Court of Canada. However, not all decisions are eligible for appeal or review, especially those involving serious criminality.

Temporary Resident Permit (TRP):

  • In some cases, an individual who is criminally inadmissible may be issued a Temporary Resident Permit (TRP) to enter or stay in Canada temporarily. The TRP is discretionary and is typically granted for specific reasons, such as significant economic, social, or humanitarian benefits to Canada.

Legal Representation:

  • Due to the complexities of the law and the serious consequences of a refusal, applicants with a criminal history are often advised to seek legal representation. An experienced immigration lawyer can provide guidance on the likelihood of success, the possibility of rehabilitation, and the preparation of a strong application.

Impact on Existing Permanent Residents

Permanent residents (PRs) of Canada are not immune to the impact of criminality on their status. Engaging in criminal activities can lead to serious immigration consequences, including the loss of PR status and removal from Canada.


Loss of Status:

  • A permanent resident who is convicted of a crime may face proceedings to strip their status. This is particularly the case with serious criminality, which involves any offense punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of at least 10 years, or an actual sentence of more than six months.

Serious Criminality Under IRPA Section 36(1):

  • Serious criminality is defined in Section 36(1) of the IRPA and includes crimes committed in Canada that can result in a sentence of ten years or more, or a crime committed outside Canada that, if committed in Canada, would result in a similar sentence.

Removal Orders:

  • Permanent residents convicted of serious crimes may be issued a removal order. There are different types of removal orders, and the type issued will depend on the severity of the crime and the sentence imposed. A removal order can lead to the individual being deported from Canada and barred from returning for a specified period, or permanently in some cases.

Appeal Rights:

  • PRs may have the right to appeal a removal order to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB), except in cases of serious criminality involving a sentence of six months or more, or in cases of organized crime, national security, or human or international rights violations.

The Impact of Convictions Within Canada:

  • For crimes committed within Canada, the criminal justice system will process the individual according to Canadian law, and any conviction and sentence will have a direct impact on their immigration status.

The Impact of Convictions Outside Canada:

  • Convictions that occur outside Canada are also relevant to a PR’s status. These are evaluated based on how the offense would be treated under Canadian law. If the offense is one that would result in serious criminality in Canada, it can lead to the same immigration consequences as if the crime had been committed within Canada.

Inadmissibility Reports and Hearings:

  • If a PR is suspected of inadmissibility due to criminality, the CBSA may prepare an inadmissibility report. If the Minister's delegate determines the report is well-founded, a referral for an admissibility hearing before the IRB may follow.

Humanitarian & Compassionate Considerations:

  • In some cases, even when serious criminality is established, there may be grounds for the PR to remain in Canada based on humanitarian and compassionate considerations. This could include factors like established family ties in Canada, the best interests of children involved, or the potential consequences of returning to their home country.

Criminal Rehabilitation:

  • PRs who have been convicted of a crime may seek criminal rehabilitation. If successful, this can remove the grounds of inadmissibility. However, this is generally available for offenses committed outside Canada. For domestic convictions, the PR would need to pursue a record suspension (formerly known as a pardon).

Implications for Citizenship:

  • Criminal convictions can also impact a PR’s ability to apply for Canadian citizenship. They must not have been the subject of a report on inadmissibility or a removal order, and must meet the requirements of physical presence and tax filing, among others, without unfulfilled conditions relating to their PR status.

Path to Citizenship

Permanent residents of Canada can apply for Canadian citizenship, but their path can be significantly affected by any criminal convictions. Here’s a comprehensive look at how criminality impacts the citizenship process:


Eligibility Requirements for Citizenship:

  • To become a Canadian citizen, permanent residents must meet several criteria, including a specified period of physical presence in Canada, adequate knowledge of English or French, passing a citizenship test (if required), and having no unfulfilled conditions relating to their PR status.

Physical Presence:

  • Applicants must be physically present in Canada for at least 1,095 days (three years) out of the five years before applying. Time spent in Canada as a non-permanent resident may count towards this requirement to a limited extent.

Income Tax Filing:

  • Applicants must have filed Canadian income taxes, if required under the Income Tax Act, for at least three years within the five-year period, or for the five years immediately before the application.

Prohibitions Affecting Citizenship:

  • Individuals may not be eligible for citizenship if they:

    • Are under a removal order (have been asked by Canadian officials to leave Canada).

    • Are currently charged with, on trial for, or involved in an appeal of an indictable offense in Canada or an offense outside Canada that would be indictable under Canadian law.

    • Have been convicted of a criminal offense in the past four years (this includes convictions outside Canada).

    • Are serving a sentence outside of Canada.

    • Are under investigation for, are charged with, or have been convicted of a war crime or a crime against humanity.

Impact of Criminality on Citizenship Applications:

  • Any criminal convictions can delay the processing of a citizenship application or result in its refusal. This is particularly the case with indictable offenses or with convictions that led to sentences of six months or more, which can result in prohibitions on applying for citizenship for four years or more.

Deemed Rehabilitation:

  • As with permanent residence, individuals with criminal convictions outside Canada may be deemed rehabilitated after a certain period, typically ten years for serious criminality or five years for other offenses, provided they have no subsequent convictions.

Application for Rehabilitation:

  • If the requisite time period has not elapsed for deemed rehabilitation, an individual may apply for rehabilitation before applying for citizenship. This involves demonstrating that they have led a stable lifestyle and are unlikely to be involved in further criminal activity.

Record Suspensions (Pardons):

  • For convictions within Canada, applicants may seek a record suspension (pardon) from the Parole Board of Canada. A successful record suspension removes the prohibition on applying for citizenship that a conviction might cause.

Disclosure of Criminal Convictions:

  • Applicants must fully disclose their criminal history on their citizenship application, even if the conviction has been removed from their record or is not considered criminal in their home country. Failure to disclose can result in a charge of misrepresentation, which could lead to the revocation of PR status and inadmissibility for citizenship.

Revocation of Citizenship:

  • Canadian citizenship can be revoked if it was obtained through false representation or fraud, or by knowingly concealing material circumstances, which can include criminal history.

Decision and Appeals:

  • Citizenship officers will make decisions on applications, taking into account all the circumstances of a case. Applicants have the right to appeal a decision to refuse citizenship on substantive grounds to the Federal Court of Canada.

Legal Remedies and Support

For individuals who have had issues with criminality and are seeking to enter Canada or maintain their status as permanent residents, there are various legal remedies and forms of support available. These mechanisms are designed to address past criminality and assist in the immigration process.


Rehabilitation for Persons Inadmissible on Grounds of Criminality:

  • Rehabilitation is a formal process that individuals can pursue if they are considered inadmissible to Canada due to past criminal activity. It demonstrates that the individual has been reformed and is unlikely to engage in future criminal activity.

  • There are two types of rehabilitation: individual rehabilitation and deemed rehabilitation.

Individual Rehabilitation:

  • An individual can apply for rehabilitation if at least five years have passed since the completion of the criminal sentence, which includes any probation or parole.

  • The application process for individual rehabilitation requires detailed documentation, including the applicant's full criminal record, the circumstances and conduct since the conviction, and any supporting documentation that proves the individual's stability and reformed character.

  • The decision to approve an application for rehabilitation is discretionary and is made by Canadian immigration officers who assess whether the applicant poses a risk to Canadian society.

Deemed Rehabilitation:

  • Deemed rehabilitation occurs automatically over time if the person has been convicted of only one non-serious offense and enough time has passed since the end of their sentence.

  • The timeframe for deemed rehabilitation depends on the nature of the offense. For example, at least ten years must have passed for serious criminality, while less serious offenses generally require five years.

Record Suspension or Pardon:

  • In Canada, a record suspension (formerly known as a pardon) is granted by the Parole Board of Canada and effectively seals the criminal record from public disclosure within the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC).

  • A record suspension does not erase a conviction but removes it from active criminal records. It can be a critical step for those seeking to mitigate the impact of past criminality on their immigration status.

  • To be eligible for a record suspension, a certain period must pass after the sentence is completed: five years for summary offenses and ten years for indictable offenses.

Temporary Resident Permit (TRP):

  • A TRP may be issued to an individual who is inadmissible to Canada for criminality but has a justifiable reason to travel to Canada. This permit is temporary and does not constitute a permanent solution.

  • A TRP is particularly useful for individuals who need to come to Canada while they are inadmissible and are waiting for the outcome of their rehabilitation application or for the period required for deemed rehabilitation to pass.

Legal Representation:

  • Navigating the complexities of immigration law, especially when criminality is involved, often requires the expertise of legal professionals.

  • Immigration lawyers can assist in preparing rehabilitation applications, advise on the likelihood of success, and represent individuals in their dealings with immigration authorities.

Support Services:

  • Various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community groups in Canada offer support to individuals dealing with criminal inadmissibility. These services can range from legal advice to assistance in the rehabilitation process and integration into Canadian society.

Humanitarian and Compassionate (H&C) Considerations:

  • In some cases, individuals may make a request for permanent residence on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, which allows officers to grant exceptions if strict adherence to the law would result in unusual, undeserved, or disproportionate hardship.

  • H&C considerations do not override criminal inadmissibility, but they may be factored into other discretionary decisions, such as the issuance of a TRP.

Impact of Criminality on Family Members:

  • The criminality of one family member can impact the immigration applications of the entire family. Therefore, when one member is inadmissible, it's crucial for the whole family to seek legal advice to understand their options.

Continued Monitoring and Compliance:

  • Even after overcoming inadmissibility through rehabilitation or a TRP, individuals are often required to demonstrate continued compliance with Canadian law and may be subject to monitoring.

Case Studies and Precedents

Case studies and legal precedents play a pivotal role in understanding how criminality impacts immigration status in Canada. They provide real-world examples of how the law is applied and interpreted by the courts and immigration authorities. Here’s a detailed look at how case law influences the immigration landscape in the context of criminality:


Understanding Legal Precedents:

  • Legal precedents are past court decisions that set a standard for how similar cases should be resolved in the future. In the context of immigration, precedents from the Federal Court and the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) often guide decision-making.

Key Areas Influenced by Case Law:

  • Determining Serious Criminality: Precedents help define what constitutes 'serious criminality' under IRPA. For instance, courts have considered factors such as the maximum potential sentence and the nature of the crime.

  • Overcoming Inadmissibility: Cases that involve rehabilitation or the granting of a Temporary Resident Permit (TRP) can establish benchmarks for what immigration officers should consider when assessing an individual’s application.

  • Misrepresentation: Precedents have clarified the obligations of applicants regarding the disclosure of criminal history and the consequences of misrepresentation.

  • Humanitarian and Compassionate Considerations: Case law has shaped how H&C factors should be weighed in the face of criminal inadmissibility.

Significant Case Studies:

  • Cases Involving Serious Crimes: Cases where individuals were deemed inadmissible due to serious crimes like assault or drug trafficking can show how the IRB and courts handle removal orders and appeals.

  • DUI Cases: With changes to the Criminal Code making DUIs serious criminality, case law post-change provides insight into the new legal landscape for individuals with DUI convictions.

  • Rehabilitation and Deemed Rehabilitation: Court decisions regarding the rehabilitation process can illustrate the factors that contribute to a successful application, such as evidence of reform and the passage of time.

  • Impact of Foreign Convictions: Cases that involve the equivalency of foreign convictions to Canadian law can guide how similar future cases are assessed by immigration authorities.

Precedent-Setting Decisions:

  • High-profile or controversial decisions can set precedents, which may influence public opinion and lead to changes in legislation or policy. For example, if a decision on a particular case leads to perceived injustice, there may be calls for legislative reform.

Researching Case Law:

  • Understanding the impact of criminality on immigration involves researching relevant case law, which can be accessed through legal databases, court records, or summaries from legal firms specializing in immigration law.

Analysis of Real-Life Scenarios:

  • By examining the details of individual cases, one can gain a deeper understanding of the nuances involved in immigration decisions related to criminality. This includes assessing the severity of the crime, the individual's history before and after the offense, and other personal circumstances.

Recent Developments in Case Law:

  • Immigration law is continually evolving, and recent cases can reflect or prompt changes in how the law is interpreted and applied. Keeping abreast of recent decisions is crucial for immigration practitioners and those affected by criminal inadmissibility.

Case studies and precedents offer a window into the practical application of immigration law and provide a roadmap for navigating the complex interplay between criminality and immigration status. For individuals facing inadmissibility due to criminality, understanding relevant case law is crucial to formulating an effective response and can be instrumental in the success of their immigration applications or appeals.


Comparative Study

Comparison with Other Countries

The way Canada handles criminality in immigration is not unique, but there are variations in how different countries approach this issue. By comparing Canadian policies with those of other countries, we can gain perspective on the relative strictness of laws, the opportunities for rehabilitation, and the balance between public safety and individual rights.


United States:

  • In the U.S., criminal inadmissibility is a major component of immigration law. The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) lists multiple criminal grounds for inadmissibility and deportation, similar to Canada's IRPA. However, the U.S. has a broader list of aggravated felonies that can lead to removal and fewer opportunities for discretionary relief.

United Kingdom:

  • The UK's approach includes the refusal of entry or stay for those with a criminal record, particularly those sentenced to a year or more in prison. The UK also uses a 'good character' requirement for citizenship applicants, which considers criminality among other factors.

Australia:

  • Australia's migration regulations also include character tests for visa applicants, where a substantial criminal record, defined as a sentence of 12 months or more, can lead to visa cancellation or refusal. The character test is quite broad and includes consideration of past and present criminal conduct.

European Union:

  • EU countries adhere to the Schengen Agreement, which allows for the sharing of criminal record information among member states. This facilitates the assessment of criminality in immigration decisions, though each country has its own laws regarding the impact of criminal convictions on immigration status.

International Law Implications:

  • International agreements like the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) may influence how countries treat immigrants with criminal records, especially in cases involving family members or minors.

Rehabilitation and Reintegration:

  • Different countries have various mechanisms for allowing individuals with past criminal convictions to rehabilitate and reintegrate into society. These can range from pardons and expungements to visas that allow for temporary entry despite inadmissibility.

Human Rights Considerations:

  • The study would also consider how the balance between protecting society and upholding individual human rights is struck in different legal systems.

Effectiveness and Fairness:

  • Effectiveness relates to the goal of public safety and whether the policies effectively prevent crime. Fairness involves assessing whether the policies disproportionately affect certain groups or undermine opportunities for rehabilitation.

Personal and Societal Impact

The intersection of criminality with the process of obtaining Canadian permanent residence and citizenship has significant implications not only for the individuals directly involved but also for society at large.


Impact on Individuals:

  • Stigma and Discrimination: Individuals with criminal records may face stigma and discrimination that can impede their integration into Canadian society, even if they have served their sentence or been rehabilitated.

  • Family Separation: Immigration policies related to criminality can result in family separation when one family member is deemed inadmissible. This can have profound emotional and financial impacts on families.

  • Employment Challenges: A criminal record can limit employment opportunities, which is a crucial aspect of economic integration for new residents.

  • Mental Health: The stress associated with the uncertainty of immigration proceedings and the potential for deportation can take a significant toll on an individual's mental health.

  • Legal and Financial Burdens: The cost of legal representation and the immigration process itself can be substantial, potentially placing a financial strain on individuals and their families.

Impact on Society:

  • Public Safety: The primary societal benefit of stringent immigration policies related to criminality is the perceived enhancement of public safety.

  • Social Cohesion: Criminality in immigration can strain social cohesion if communities feel that immigrants are held to different standards or if policies are seen as discriminatory.

  • Economic Contributions: Skilled workers who face barriers to immigration due to past criminality may represent a loss of potential economic contributions to Canadian society.

  • Legal System Resources: Extensive immigration proceedings related to criminality can tax the legal system and divert resources from other areas.

  • Civic Engagement: Individuals who successfully transition from permanent residence to citizenship are more likely to engage in civic activities and contribute to democratic processes.

In conclusion, the impact of criminality on Canadian permanent residence and citizenship is a complex issue with far-reaching implications for individuals and society. The laws and policies governing this area aim to balance public safety and the integrity of the immigration system with fairness and the opportunity for rehabilitation.


If you need help with admissibility or other immigration matters, please feel free to book a professional consultation with our Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant.

49 views0 comments
bottom of page